Jeffrey Sachs doesn’t lie, does he?

Jeff Sachs, the famous economist and university professor (Columbia U.) appeared recently (Oct. 2011) on a Charlie Rose on PBS program discussing, what else, the economy. Specifically, the depression or at least recession (at this point the “recession” has been the longest and slowest recovery in the history of the USA, which pretty much makes it discretionary as to whether it is called one term or the other, IMNSHO.) and how to climb out of it. He was adamant that he did not regret having voted for President Barack Obama, but he was not reluctant to criticize President Obama’s shortcomings, disappointments, and downright failures.

In particular, Professor Sachs made a very interesting comparison that I had not thought about. It is commonly said, and rarely said with any reference to the source of such statistics, that the upper 50% of Americans pay 90% of the taxes, and occasionally people mention that the top earning 1% (who make most of their income from their money [i.e. investments] not their labors) pay 50% of the total tax revenue collected by the USA. What Jeffrey Sacks brought to light was that the federal government takes in as taxes, about 17% of the national GDP (Gross Domestic Product) which is general estimated at about US$14.5 TRILLION at this point (remarkable close to the figure for the National Debt even though the two are not directly connected i.e. GDP and Govt. Debt have to do with productivity of the work force in the case of GDP, while national debt has to do with over-spending of the revenue received by the IRS on the expenses approved by Congress). The individual states (even though some states charge no personal income tax) collect about 10% of the GDP in taxes, so that approximately 27% of the GDP goes into the various governments to pay for the things that governments provide. Everything from social services like health care (e.g. Medicare and MedicAid), to free postage for congressmen, to the Army, Air Force, Marines salaries and weapons, to roads and bridges (remember we are talking about both federal and state governments here), police and education.

The point that was new information to me, and as usual I don’t know the source of Mr. Sachs’ information, but according to him, the top earning 1% of the population has annual income of … are you ready … that top 1% of the people earn 25% of the GDP as income in any given year. That seems about right because another source reported, back in 2009 that the people who had more than US$398,000 income took in 23.5% of GDP, after a minor step toward recovery from the financial crisis of September 2008 (during which the number of persons with net worth of US$1,000,000, excluding the value of their principal residence, dropped from 9.2 million in 2007 to just 7.8 million in 2009 according to this Huffington Post item by Grace Kiser and Ryan McCarthy (posted in September of 2010).

Considering the ever-widening gulf between the very rich and the middle class, it seems reasonable that over the last couple of years the upper crust may have gained a point and a half against the total of GDP. That may be obvious to most people who see the sizes of bonuses on Wall Street, and although they have not coalesced around a single theme or issue, may be a spark for the protesters occupying a portion of Wall Street at this time. But that is not what struck me about the figures Jeffrey Sacks mentioned. It was something else.

What took me by surprise was the fact that the government operates the whole country (and interest, including a couple of wars, overseas) on what just 1% of the population takes home as income. Now, admittedly, it is the most affluent 1% of the country, but still, the private income of some 2.2 million people (because there are reportedly approximately 217,000,000 taxpayers in the country) is equal to the entire revenue of the US Government and the 50 state governments combined. Think about that for a moment.

There are no shortage of voices bemoaning the awful, terrible, disastrous potential of the Buffet Rule, increasing the marginal tax rate on those earning more than US$1 million per year. Remember, however, that during the era of President Eisenhower the highest marginal tax rate was 95% (that was after stepping up the various rates that applied to sums of income less than the threshold of the 95% bracket, so the 95% rate only applied to “the next dollar” of income above that minimum limit). Okay, raising anyone’s taxes to 95% for any income bracket would be political suicide today, so let’s not even suggest that we could afford to go there. But consider a more modest proposal.

What if we made the first million dollars of income exempt from income taxes (not for everyone, just for those earning more than US$1 million per year) but then imposed an “honest-to-goodness,” every-penny-counts, tax rate of 50% on everything else above that first million. Are there people out there who would suffer from only taking home US$1 million in a year? It would be hard to maintain both the yacht in France and the other one just for cruising the Caribbean, admittedly, but you could hardly call giving up one of your yachts a “hardship” could you? How much would that help?

We have to go back and calculate some base numbers. Governments (plural, state and federal) take in about 27% of GDP, or which 10% goes to states directly. Ultra high earners take in 25%, but we are exempting the first million for each of them, so that subtracts 2,200,000 times US$1,000,000 which comes to US$2.2 TRILLION of person income set aside from taxable amounts. However that leaves about (remember all these figures are “rounded” and only approximations in the first place) US$1.45 TRILLION to be taxed at 50% which would be increased income tax revenue of US$725,000,000,000.
The Obama Administration’s budget for 2012 looks to be roughly the same as for 2011, with a total budget deficit of US$1.3 TRILLION. In light of that shortfall, even US$725 BILLION isn’t going to solve the problem, nor is a 1.5% reduction in an overall budget of something North of US$3 TRILLION. Here is a table from Wikipedia outlining the not yet passed Obama Administration’s budget of 2012.

The President’s budget for 2012 totals $3.729 trillion. Percentages in parentheses indicate percentage change compared to 2011. This budget request is broken down by the following expenditures:
Mandatory spending: $2.109 trillion (-3.2%)
$761 billion (+4.6%) – Social Security
$468 billion (-4.1%) – Medicare
$269 billion (-2.5%) – Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
$598 billion (-16.2%) – Unemployment/Welfare/Other mandatory spending
$240 billion (+17.1%) – Interest on National Debt
Discretionary spending: $1.344 trillion (-3.1%)
$553.0 billion (+0.7%) – Department of Defense
$126.3 billion (-23.3%) – Overseas Contingency Operations
$79.9 billion (-1.8%) – Department of Health and Human Services
$77.4 billion (+6.2%) – Department of Education
$58.8 billion (+3.1%) – Department of Veterans Affairs
$49.8 billion (+0.5%) – Department of Housing and Urban Development
$50.1 billion (-0.9%) – Department of State and Other International Programs
$43.2 billion (-0.9%) – Department of Homeland Security
$29.6 billion (+4.2%) – Department of Energy
$28.2 billion (-7.2%) – Department of Justice
$23.8 billion (-7.1%) – Department of Agriculture
$18.2 billion (-6.7%) – National Aeronautics and Space Administration
$13.4 billion (-4.1%) – Department of Transportation
$14.0 billion (+0.8%) – Department of the Treasury
$12.1 billion (+0.3%) – Department of the Interior
$12.8 billion (-8.3%) – Department of Labor
$13.0 billion (-53.6%) – Troubled Asset Relief Program
$6.0 billion (+200%) – Disaster costs
$44.9 billion (-3.9%) – Other On-budget Discretionary Spending
The Iraq War and the War in Afghanistan are not included in the Department of Defense regular budget, but are included in Overseas Contingency Operations.

The WHOLE BUDGET ABOVE is “Clickable” to take you to the Wikipedia article.

It is enough to give a tax accountant a headache. And it often does.

Sincerely,

Stafford “Doc” Williamson

http://lifestyle.psryk.us

http://weightloss.psyrk.us
Getting LUCKY?
P.S. Oh, yes, and interesting coincidence came up in my calculator as I was crunching the numbers for this article. I said US$2.2 TRILLION tax exempt income for the 2.2 million millionaires so they won’t feel pinched, so out of the US$3.65 TRILLION they take home in income one way or another, that leaves US$1.45 TRILLION to be “taxable” at the highest marginal rate (according to my suggestion of a “real” 50% tax above US$1 MILLION income). But the budget deficit is way above that US$725 BILLION which even a 50% marginal tax rate would generate. That amount is in the lofty heights of US$1.3 TRILLION budget deficit. However, I discovered, that by the strangest of coincidences (???) a 95% tax rate on US$1.45 TRILLION comes out to be exactly US$1,353,750,000,000 (which is, of course, US$1.3 TRILLION) in additional tax revenue. Now isn’t that interesting?

P.P.S. Professor Sachs is, like me, a strong advocate for economic development in Africa. He calls attention to the fact that most of rural Africa does not even have access to electric power. See his comments here.

Earth Sheltered Housing 2100 (interior view)

Jetset Journalists

I must admit this doesn’t have a lot to do with beach houses, bikinis or surf and sand, except that on those rare moments when they do kick off their shoes, these are some of the folks who may find themselves kicking back with Sir Richard on Necker Island, or a Mediterranean yacht, with that “new girl” heiress who just bought Cindy Spellings house in Beverly Hills.  (The biggest one in Beverly Hills, in case you didn’t know.)  I am talking about the assorted adrenalin junkies like Martha Radditz, or Christiane Amanpour who seem almost as happy dodging bullets and hand grenades as staring into the bright lights of the television news studios.

But there is on “journalist” who crosses a whole lot of lines that for other people might be dividing lines, but not for the founder and controller of the HuffingtonPost.com news website.  Arianna Huffington can be brash and abrasive (a good deal of the time).  To me it is particularly annoying when she seems to have swallowed some poorly constructed excuse as if it were a legitimate explanation of some set of mis-matched facts, because she is a very bright woman, who often has something worthwhile to say.  At least occasionally.

Sunday Showdown

Well, as it happens when swords were crossed last Sunday on the television shows filled with parrying pundits, and slippery spinners, Arianna Huffington was sitting in as an invited panelist in what Christiane calls her “round-table” of experts.  There, among the inevitable George Will, and a senior member of the Clinton administration, and a new Fox “journalists” (read “clack”) whose name I have intentionally suppressed from my recollection of these events, there say Arianna sounding like the only one with even one foot in the world of reality.

As a sidenote, in effect making his own commentary by not commenting on it, Fareed Zakaria in his show GPS, which incidentally now shows up as http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/ merely said, “I assume you’ve heard plenty about the US budget crisis, so we are going to talk about something else.”

However, meanwhile, back at “This Week” with Christiane, Arianna begins to sound like the only one with even one foot firmly planted in the world of reality as soon as she speaks.  ”We don’t have a budget crisis,” she insists, her still thick accent leaving no doubt who is speaking at the moment.  ”We have a jobs crisis, we have an infrastructure crisis, we have a demand crisis …”   She went on from there, but the key point is that all of this moaning and groaning and purely political maneuvering that is happening in Washington at both ends of the mall, is all for show and counts for nothing.

For all the huffing and puffing that both panelists and politicians were doing, the lesson to be gained is that when a politician (or political reporter) uses all their hot air to puff up their own “crucial” importance to the country and its imaginary problems, he/she should be prepared to have her/his balloon popped by someone like Arianna, whose sharp eyes were all it took to pierce the veil of the false reality.

The “grand bargain” deals that have been spoken about (leaked from behind closed door negotiations between Speaker Boehner and President Obama) were in the realm of 4 trillion dollars.  Not entirely coincidentally, that is about the same number as has been projected for the revenue increase that is already scheduled to happen simply by allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire.  It was some mighty dirty pool that blackmailed the current administration into signing the extension to the Bush taxes cuts in the first place, and especially so because the bulk of the benefit goes to those the top 2% of wealthiest Americans.

But regardless of what budget manipulations and machinations may take place, the key to rescuing ourselves is to create jobs by creating demand, and the best possible way to create demand would be to create a foreign market for our goods.  I happen to have a “soft spot” for “intangible goods” like “information products”, but also software and entertainment, because they are things that you can sell and you still own it so you can sell it again next year, or in 7 years from now.  But the most important exports are “green technologies” that help other countries mitigate the effects of climate change.  Which brings me to subject two for today.

When You’re Hot, You’re Hot

This is some excerpts from an email I received today.
Someone calling herself “Emily L.” at Care 2 Action, admonished, “There is a large, multi-billion-dollar machine in place who wants us to think that Climate Change doesn’t exist, and that we should buy more, drive more, and consume more. ”
The Care 2 Action folks really do want to have an effect. They send in “SIGNED” petitions to whomever they think will be affected and who can effect change.

In this case, the want you to sign on here where you will find me as signature 2,451 including my comments about the “food versus fuel” myth. (scroll down and take a look at it if you aren’t familiar with my position)

Emily L. goes on to say:
“Our world is changing. Rivers are overflowing their boundaries. Carefully tended crops have failed due to drought and severe storms. Forests are turning into tinder. Massive glaciers are melting at an alarming rate.

The reality of climate change can seem overwhelming. But facing this new reality is empowering — we already know how to solve the climate crisis. By making a transition away from oil and coal and using renewable energy technology, we will reduce the pollution that is warming our climate.

Lies and misinformation are never the answer. Please take a moment today to add your voice to the masses who choose reality over deception and lies when it comes to the Climate Crisis. ”

 I’m Celebrating A New House

Okay, I grant that “celebrating” may be a little premature (I haven’t seen the price tag yet) but I have been looking for this type of house for years and suddenly today, in my inbox, an invitation to look at the latest (new) models of “Earth Sheltered Homes” . Now if I can find a lot with a view, somewhere in the Caribbean … St. Kitts? St. Maarten? Belize? Costa Rica? I’ll be ready to “retire” (as long as I don’t have to stop working).

Sincerely,

Stafford “Doc” Williamson

http://lifestyle.psyrk.us

 

 

 

 

A delicate jawline is one of the behavior of a attractive womanly face. Discover 4 tips that can help crossdressers and transsexuals disguise their jaws to look more feminine.

[Editor's NOTE] The above two lines of text appeared in this blog/website without the permission or approval of the owner and publisher. However, we feel that removing the unauthorized posting would be interpreted as disapproving of certain lifestyles or sexual orientations which are already unjustly subject to prejudice and persecutions. We don’t feel that way toward persons who may have characteristics dissimilar to the majority of the population. We would rather celebrate their diversity.
Sincerely,
Stafford “Doc” Williamson
http://luxury-beach-lifestyle.info
http://lifestyle.psyrk.us


Do you have a microwave oven that bit the dust? Do you miss folks microwave dinners that you like so much? Well consider that you can darn your microwave if certain parts have failed. To find out ho…
Read the Entire Article Caribbean. Beach. Yacht.

No question, the South Beach diet has busy the world by storm.

Each year, a large digit of individuals, couples, families, and friends research exclusive yacht charters, as many are aware in them. Although a large digit of individuals would like to franchise a exclusive yacht, there are many who don’t end up doin

When looking for a different spin on the family reunion or the perfect way to amuse co-workers on a business outing, yacht charters are a almighty way to plan a unique getaway. While the act of renting a yacht is often bashful for familiar rendezvous’ and family adventures, there are abundance of advantages to planning a corporate event direct this idyllic method, such as creating strong ties with consumers or strengthening employer-employee relationships.

Yacht rent involves the renting or rent of a motor yacht or sailboat with the aim of drifting concerning coastal or other island locations. Over the years, the act has turn out to be an increasingly coveted approach of considering the creation while enjoying a nice journey advancement across calming water.

Two Different Kinds of Charter

When rent a yacht, you should know there are two main types to adjudge

If you are looking forward to a good night

Bandos island resort had refurbishment throughout 2005 which saw it not only accept a classy face lift but also extend its exiting facilities and add extra accommodation.

The new look to Bandos is a nice contemporary blithe feel yet still retaining its Maldivian style and charm. Some of the accommodation has interconnecting doors for big families who need to advance out over several rooms.

There are a nice range of restaurants here that aid a range of quality dishes. The main bar and coffee shop are near the water, and the bar is a great arrange to hang out until the ancient hours of the morning.

The resort has made a huge application to accommodate families, which is not ordinary on a lot of the added islands, with a purpose-built childcare facility complete with feminine staff on hand to look after the children and provide babysitting in the evenings. Visitors with young children need to be aware that the lagoon tends to deepen quite abruptly so be careful when allowing you kids in or near the lagoon.

There are 84 acceptable rooms which look out over the beach and another 19 that are slightly set back. In accompaniment there are 48 Junior suites and 48 circular-shaped Beach villas.

Bandos is a base point for diving in the Maldives, boastfulness a decompression cell among its many facilities. The dive base here is both a Platinum Facility of the International Association of Nitrox and Technical Divers and a PADI Gold Palm Resort.

You can wait for a chosen event if you plan to get conjugal on Bandos, the ceremony is held on the beach of one of the uninhabited islands in the atoll ? Kuda Bandos ? and is followed by a private freewheel for the newlyweds on a Dhoni (Maldivian boat).

More Information:

Andrea is a travel journalist and writes about exotic locations like the Bandos island resort. Andrea also likes to write about holidays in maldives in general.

Caribbean. Luxury. Resort. .

Some of the etiquette of all-inclusive resorts is the same regardless of where you are. Other expectations can vary, depending on the resort at which you’re staying. If you’ve never been to an all-inclusive resort, then you are jump to have some questions. Here are a few of the most ordinary questions and answers to each.

How Do They Know I Have an All-Inclusive Package Deal?

Each resort varies on how it handles all-inclusive commuter identification. Some resorts only offer all-inclusive accommodations, in which case no extra proof of your circumstances is required. Those that offer tiered packages for guests and those at which guests have the chance of purchasing a basic or all-inclusive stay will provide you with some sort of proof of your all-inclusive guest status.

This proof is usually in the form of a wristband or similar wearable item that will allow you to get drinks, food, access to activities, and access to additional services without extra charges. Keeping Chase of and having your all-inclusive ID with you at all age is basic and expected.

If you misplace your ID while at the resort you must inform the anterior desk immediately. A replacement ID will be issued, but they will also need to know that they should cancel the previously issued ID in behest to avert delivery all-inclusive services to guests who have not paid for that service.

How Do I Make Sure I get My Money’s worth?

Find out as much as you can about what’s included in your all-inclusive box before creation any travel planning or booking your accommodations. Just as it says it’s all-inclusive doesn’t mean that it in fact includes all activities, food services, and additional amenities. In fact, each all-inclusive deal can be different from all the others out there. Take some time to review the details of your all-inclusive box before committing to no matter which and audit that it really is distinction the money that you will be paying.

Once you’ve selected an all-inclusive resort, you should not blench to get exactly what you’ve paid for. This means that if you’re mistakenly asked to pay for a aid activity or meal to which you are entitled at no extra action under the expression´s of your all-inclusive package, you will need to declaim up. Don’t feel bad about pointing out the blooper and getting it corrected. Bring the affliction to the attention of the resort bar and ask to declaim with someone who can answer the issue if the being with whom you are speaking does not have the authority to handle the affliction for you.

You need not be embarrassed about any confusion that arises. Provided you handle yourself in a kind and courteous manner, there is totally no shame in ensuring that you get exactly what you’ve paid for and the resort bar will be more than happy to help answer the problem.

How Do I Use All the Equipment, Facilities and Services Available?

In most all-inclusive resorts, there are particular expectations for guests using resort equipment, supplies and services. In some places, you will be aimed to audit out any equipment, towels or additional items which you need, and return them to the appropriate environment once you have buffed using them. Doing so will avert extra charges from being billed to your account.

Breakage to equipment, loss of seashore towels, and additional kinds of attack or mistreatment of gear and additional resort asset´s will lead to extra charges being tacked on to your bill. Just as you have an all-inclusive pass doesn’t mean that ordinary courtesy and general good behavior no longer apply.

What About Tipping at an All-Inclusive Resort?

In behest to know how to handle tips while at the resort, you will need to know what’s included in your all-inclusive package. In many cases, gratuities for resort bar are already included in the cost. If you’re ambivalent whether tips are already factored into your altogether bill, then don’t blench to question resort management apropos the matter. They should be able to tell you about each and every being action included in your package.

Many people even consider it polite and appropriate to tip resort bar for serving drinks and food in particular. Other accept that by tipping they will receive better aid and accordingly disregard the resort managements’ statements apropos the excessive nature of tipping while staying at the resort.

If you wish to tip while at the resort, you are absolutely entitled to do so. Just keep in mind that in most cases, tips are not expected. It’s also basic to achieve that any tips you do give need not be huge, especially if gratuities are already included in your all-inclusive charges.

More Information:

BookIt.com is an online travel battalion determined and ardent to becoming the captain in delivery travelers with the most intuitive online booking experience full of relevant information, helpful guides and travel tips. Find big deals on secrets capri at BookIt.com!

Caribbean. Luxury. Resort. .

Is is any wonder that people are leaving the country to retire?  If I retired tomorrow (or the first day I was eligible for Social Security income), my health insurance (before Medicare was available) would cost me more than half my Social Security check, every month.  If I moved to Costa Rica, my health care insurance would cost me about 1 tenth of one month’s Social Security check for the entire year!  I could also build a two story all concrete construction house for about US$50,000 with 3 bedrooms, add a second bathroom and some upgrades, plus a double garage for about another US$10,000, and taxes would cost me a whopping $45 a year on such a property.

Now, it is true, I’ve been thinking a lot about moving to Costa Rica, or Roatan (in Honduras) or possibly the beautiful little island country of St. Kitts and Nevis (2 islands, 1 country).  But the oppressive heat of Arizona summers are not the only thing hastening my departure.  The medical system in this country is full of amazingly good doctors (not that there are not good doctors in most countries), but the way in which medicine is “practiced” is anything but healthy.

This week alone, I have seen two glaring examples of what makes healthcare cost ten times what it does in other countries, well, three if you count the cost of brand name drugs (versus generic drugs).  The most recent was in trying to get a prescription of my own re-filled.  Notice that is RE-filled, not a new prescription, but one I have been taking for some time, and for which the “supply chain” has been working for something close to a year without major incident.  Suddenly on of several prescriptions in an order reaches the end of the authorized refills.  As they say in Britain, that’s when it looked as if someone threw a spanner in the works.

Actually, I suppose it was reasonable caution on the part of a doctor who said, “Okay, we’ll give him one more 90 day refill, but then he has to come in for a checkup. ”  Not so unreasonable generally speaking.  Everyone should have some kind of checkin or check-up with their physician at least once a year.  However in my case, I am seeing a specialist for one condition, as well as my primary care physician, and then an gastroenterologist for an annual checkup due to some minor surgery a couple of years ago.  How much “doctoring” does one man need (who still walks around without falling down, getting lost [not too often, anyway], or bleeding from his wounds)?

Of course, it didn’t help this situation, in my case, that my usual primary care physician was away for a couple of weeks, so my prior primary care physician, a highly accredited doctor with a Canadian education and a cautious nature too boot, was the one responsible.  That is not to say, “to blame,” necessarily.  The wheels really fell off the wagon when the fax hit the pharmacy after I had placed my refill request in the highly efficient manner of a web form, that actually got 2 of the three medicines winging their way to me with all due haste.

But the pharmacy “interpreted” the PCP’s (that’s Primary Care Physician in “pharmacy speak”) as being a denial, so they sent me an email saying, we can’t fulfill that order, the other drugs are on the way, but call us to find out what happened.  I might as well have called a blind person for a description of the collision of the cars on the nearest major intersection.  He or she could probably have been more succinct, and more accurate.

So the point is, that after 4 calls to the (mail-order) pharmacy, and 3 calls to my primary care physician’s offices to speak to the assist (of no particular acceditation or status, other than pleasant and trying to be helpful, and it was actually 3 different people) they say they’ll send it again, but I have to come in for an appoinment AND the soonest that can happen is not until next Monday, at which time I will be seeing my former PCP’s Physician’s Assistant, also a lovely helpful, even thoughtful and kind man, but several most days of delay until a resolution comes.  Ah, but my story isn’t over yet (and I don’t just mean, wait for a Monday update) because there is a whole other, even greater example of how marvelously (malevolently?) inefficient healthcare can get in this country.

You see my mother-in-law has been quite ill lately.  A couple of hospital visits, in which x-rays, ct-scans (more than one) and at least one MRI, have revealed that a slip and fall cracked a vertebra in her spine (L4, to be exact).  So after 2 hospital visits the first an emergency room only cursory look, (but with x-rays and CT-scan), the second with MRI and 3 days stay, she arrives at a licensed care facility (which at 99 seems a reasonable choice) (although she’s been through 2 rounds of “hospice care” in the expectation that she had less than 90 days left to live both 4 and 3 years ago, I believe it was).  The licensed care facility is not only depressing and a little scary, but not well suited to her needs which include being legally blind, and nearly deaf in both ears (I think she exaggerates that, she hears me pretty well, it’s her daughters she seems to need to have repeat themselves).  So in the second licensed care facility, they arrange for PT (physical therapy) which only aggravate the spine, the compression fracture and the woman attached thereto.

So, they send her off to a “pain clinic” where the doctor seems disinclined to waste his time on someone so old, at least according to my wife’s report of her observations of the visit.  The next day, it is off to an osteopathic doctor, who also turns out to be a Physician’s Assistant (which, by the way, is nearly equivalent to a doctor in this state, although he/she practices under the supervision an approval of the doctor to whom he/she is attached, a good feature of Arizona medical practice in my opinion).  She, in this case, is a magnificent woman who exudes confidence and recommends a “camp corset” to relieve back pain, along with a bone growth nasal spray (yes, really, legitimate, mainstream medicine for bones in a nasal spray) and “home” she goes to the care facility again.  (Actually there is a prolonged procedure of waiting to be “seen” at a durable medical goods dealer without an appointment to get her the “camp corset”, on the way back to her temporary quarters.)

No sooner do we arrive there, than a Licensed Nurse Practitioner (again, a partner of a doctor, like a PA) suggests transdermal pain patches for the patient’s spine.  This is after 5 doctors or equivalents (or more) because the narcotic pain reliever is insufficient to allow her to even sleep comfortably.  The next day, the patient (my mother-in-law, remember, even I tend to dissociate from the personal when discussing medical information) is in such pain she is hysterical and yelling at the staff.  The staff agree to call the LNP to get her a calming prescription.  They call.

They leave a message with the answering service.

The answering service calls the LNP with this “urgent” message, and they leave another message on her home answering machine.

The daughter calls the care facility.  ”Oh yes, we called that in.”  Hours later “mother” confirms she has had no additional pill.  Another call to the care facility, another call to the LNP, intercepted by the answering service to say that they left a message previously, but if it is urgent they will try to contact her directly.  Finally word gets through to the LNP, and she calls to confirm that she has ordered the pill for “mother”.   Another hour passes and …

The licensed care desk says yes the pill was ordered, but the order was faxed to a pharmacy 52 miles from the facility and will be DELIVERED BY MESSENGER from there.  That is pill: Quantity One (1) hand delivered because it is “urgently” needed (from about 6 hours earlier).

And that, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, is why, in Arizona I pay nearly US$600 per MONTH for health insurance for one person, age 60, when I could instead pay US$130 per YEAR for a family of 4 with a view of the Caribbean thrown in.